This report looks into the decisions and practices of the PRB, in order to assess the effectiveness of the implemented measures and the level of impartiality of PRB in administering justice to parties. Similarly, to the previous report, findings here also indicate a lack of consistency in a number of PRB decisions that contradict previous decisions. The PRB does not seem to have practiced a methodology of referring to previous decisions when handling complaints. The application of such practice would have likely reduced the number of inconsistent decisions. D+ has continuously highlighted the need for greater standardization of PRB decisions, in order for decisions to be reasonably predictable by parties, as a result of precedents.
